'Taxi to the Dark Side\r'

'Brutality, degradation, in displaceiente treatment, cruelty, these atomic number 18 the terminology that are often ascribed to the act of squeeze, whatever radiation diagram it maybe. The mere intention to conduct these actions reveals a conglomerate double standard (Fiala, 103). People would opt to be the punisher, the powerful, the dominant rather than existence punished, being nerveless and being dominated by most single else. It qualification not generally surmise human reputation but it reveals the situation that humans in a society would always aspire for the top beat in the ladder.To this obliterate, it is not surprising why some masses support scud, most specifically, when they are not the one who is being (or will be) single-footd. On the former(a) hand, people in like manner tend to display kindness and sympathy to separate human beings. This is the basis of the deontological godliness expressed by Immanuel Kant. This essay would deliver to search t he nature of throe and present an evaluation of the honourable values entangled. The subject of the essay would be impart on the discussion of worrying in the documentary by Alex Gibney entitled ‘ travel to the Dark positioning’.The main parentage would be that ‘badgering is chastely impermissible’ nonetheless the essay would in addition try to determine the reason behind the act of torture curiously with unions to the incident in Afghanistan and Iraq. Interrogation is the bathroomonical means to attain ‘intelligence’ or first-hand breeding that are vital in the prevention of peril such as war/s and terrorism. It house also be use to gain intimacy of the culprit behind certain execrations. One, extremity not to be commandd in an actual warfare or crime to understand the concept involved in inquiry.However, it is also a common knowledge that some information ga on that pointd through motion may not be valid. One cannot esta blish the detailuality of a certain statement that people ‘spill out’ during doubtfulnesss. In some cases, mediocre interrogation techniques are futile since the person being interrogated may not be willing to cooperate. These instances coupled with an urgent need for the ‘information’ usually calls for a ‘forceful’ kind of interrogation.In the context of this essay, the case of interrogation is known as ‘torture interrogation’ (Casebeer, 263). In the documentary ‘Taxi to the Dark Side’, torture interrogation is portrayed as a technique used to gather information from supposedly terrorists. It involves colossal hours of standing, sleep deprivation, use and application of physical force, dismay and other maltreatments that would fall under CID or acts of ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading’ treatments (Luban).Casebeer (264), explained that torture interrogations encompass the dodge that involves ‘sever e physical and/or mental imposition’ (I believe that emotional or psychological incommode can also be present especially during humiliation and inducement of fear) that is inflicted on its ‘dupe’, that is make by certain ‘perpetrators’ such as ‘interrogators and/or soldiers’ and are designed to reach a remainder such as to ‘ exclude information and confessions’. The estimable considerations that torture interrogation presents are grounded on the fact that (in most cases) during ‘torture interrogations’ the person is not insofar convicted ‘ vile’ (Fiala, 109).Torture, in its own terms, has long been considered as an im incorrupt act. Nevertheless, torture as a type of punishment can be justified since the ‘victim’ of torture is ‘guilty’ of a certain crime which could have been worst than the punishment (torture) in itself. The gap of torturing an innocent individual c reates a moral debate regarding the permissibility of torture. The utilitarian principle requires the maximization of merriment and minimization of unhappiness as standard for morality.In the ‘ticking time-bomb’ scenario, as mentioned by Casebeer (271) and in the documentary by Gibney, a bomb is placed in a certain field or establishment and unaccompanied one person (a terrorist or the bomber) knows how to locate and withdraw the bomb. If the bomb explodes, several people will be affected or will die, thus, all required parameters are to be taken to extract the germane(predicate) information from that person (terrorist or bomber). Torturing one person to be able to save more number of people is of course considerable.But it should not be taken for granted that this argument is ‘hypothetical’. In reality, this situation may not even exist. Deontological honorable motive focus on a person’s duty which implies the respect for another personâ€⠄¢s in good orders. People, according to this ethical framework, should not be do by as means rather as an end (Casebeer, 266). In torturing another person to extract information that would benefit more people denotes use that other person as means. Whether the person is guilty or innocent, torture interrogation would still involve disrespect to the other person’s right and humanity.In reflecting on the documentary, a taxi driver nicknamed Dilawar died of homicide overdue to ‘blunt force of injuries to lower extremities that complicates coronary arteria disease’ as a result of ‘torture interrogation’. The documentary elaborated that Dilawar is not-guilty. Furthermore, the documentary also highlighted that 93% of the suspected terrorists are sour over to the get together States forces to gain bounties or rewards. It also turned out that Dilawar is included in this 93%. With these in mind, the act of torture interrogation is blatantly immoral.D espite the fact that legal documents and loopholes can be found to warrant the act of ‘torture interrogation’ as can be deduced from documents, such as the memorandum for William J. Haynes II dated March 14, 2003, torture interrogation is chastely impermissible. To better justify this position, Fiala argued about the possibility of the ‘ tricky monger’ fallacy that capability result if torture terrorism would be justified and practiced in ‘extreme cases’ or ‘supreme emergencies’ (quoted by Fiala from Walzer). harmonise to Fiala, politicians or people who are granted the necessary authority to conduct torture terrorism efficiencyiness abuse their power.As Fiala states, ‘when governmental agents makes exceptions to moral principles, these exceptions can change state precedents that serve to normalize immoral behavior’. In ‘Taxi to the Dark Side’, thither is an argument regarding the slippery slope p henomena that transpired during the change in the ‘interrogation methods’ for the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. According to the documentary, the changes in the interrogation techniques are only applicable in Guantanamo. Nonetheless, the ambiguity and loopholes that surrounds the issuance resulted to the application of the interrogation techniques to Iraq.The danger of the slippery slope is when the technique is applied to innocent individuals. The documentary also mentioned that there are other prisoners that are sent to Guantanamo or in places outside the United States that permits torture interrogation because this methodology is illegal in the United States. After the discussion of the moral impermissibility of torture interrogation, it might be obvious to some people that torture interrogation is wrong. However, the question ‘why are there people who conduct such immoral acts’, might linger to a person’s mind.‘Taxi to the Other Sideâ€℠¢ illustrates the confusion and the pressure that interrogators bear up under during the ‘War against terrorism’. Most of the pressure comes from the government, the need to justify an attack or the arrest of a person. Another source of pressure, as explained in the documentary, comes from other soldiers. As one soldier testified ‘I tire’t want to go against my fellow soldiers’. Fiala (101) draw the possibility of this situation as ‘a political pressure to take decisive and dramatic actions without regard for moral niceties’.This essay concludes that torture interrogation is chastely impermissible based on the utilitarian and deontological ethical frameworks. Humans should be treated as humans. Punishments should be carried out effectively and justly. Torture interrogation does not treat humans humanely. Moreover, torture of the innocent is extremely unacceptable under moral precepts. A clearer centering on the interrogation proces s must be devised to be able to minimize the dangers of slipping stack the use of torture interrogation specifically when there is a high pressure to produce information.Legal justifications are not enough to excuse or formalise the use of torture during interrogation. It merely served as read that the legal standards are flawed and needs conterminous repair (reconstruction/revision). References Casebeer, W. D. (2005). â€Å"Torture Interrogation of Terrorists”. Fiala, A. (2008). â€Å"Torture and Terrorism”. Gibney, A. (2007) â€Å"Taxi to the Dark Side”. Luban, D. (2005). â€Å"Torture, American expressive style”. Office of Legal Counsel. (2003). â€Å"Torture Memo”.\r\n'