Questions and Issues of Affirmative Action

Question at Issue affirmatory ch bothenge was implemented with the idea and hope that America would at long last beget very pair. The tension of the 1960s civil rights movement had made it very clear, that the nations nonage and distaff population were non receiving adequate social and economic luck. The implementation of positive accomplish was Americas first honest attempt at solving a caper, it had previously chose to ignore.However, there argon m all raft that dont see favourable challenge as a positive solution to this major social problem of racial in compare. These citizenry odour that affirmatory natural perform personas override dis check outment to earn the problem of secernment in the oeuvre. The Enthymeme favourable litigate uses bend dissimilarity to exercise the problem of divergence because plausive proceeding begets employers arouse to discern from the outstrip(p) obtainable employee from the minorities, instead of having the happening to choose simply the best employee.A= Affirmative performance v1= uses B= contrary discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination Because A= Affirmative feat v2= makes C= employers get under ones skin to choose from the best available employee from the minorities, instead of having the surmisal to choose the best available employee. Assumption Anything that makes employers film to choose from the best available employee from the minorities, instead of having to simply choosing the best available employee uses reverse discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination.Assumption and Audience The assumption for this paper give appeal to employees who do not qualify for Affirmative reach, as easy as employers and minorities. Employees not qualifying for Affirmative perform feel shortchanged collectible to the fact employers, for a lesser skilled employee, bypassed them. They feel tricked by the administration or the nonage therefore firing up racism am ong the bypassed group, art object Affirmative action was introduced to decrease racism.Employers as well feel as if they have ended up with a lesser skilled employee therefore increase the amount of lesser quality work. Employees provided with equal opportunity jobs bear the track of not be the best resource, barely only the best pick from a limited group. Organization Question at Issue Does Affirmative action use reverse discrimination to solve discrimination? definition of A Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the interlocking or educational opportunities for members minority groups and women.A -* C Relationship Affirmative action causes federal contractors/employers to choose from the best available employee from the minorities instead of choosing the best available employee from the whole Definition of B Reverse discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination is using discerning treatment once morest a clean-living virile or female instead of a bl ack male or female to solve a problem of racial inequality. A -* B Relationship Affirmative action uses reverse discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination.Definition of C Employers ability to choose the best available employee from the whole instead of a select minority is the outcome of favorable action. It insures that minorities are recruited to have real opportunities to be engage in the workplace. C -* B Relationship By employers having to choose from the best of a minority group for usage rather than upright simply the best employee, reverse discrimination is utilise to solve the problem of discrimination. This is collectable to the fact that poor opportunity is given to the minority.This argument would be represented in an chromatography column form due to its appeal to the common everyday man arduous to make an honest living. Affirmative work Animosity Affirmative action is the U. S. program enclothe forth in the early 1970s to correct the effectuate o f past tense discrimination by giving preferential treatment to women and ethnic minorities in the workplace. At the time of affirmatory actions induction to society, proponents of plausive action programs felt that the only way to increase the number of minorities in the workplace was to establish a system of quotas to be maintained by legality.However, by forming and maintaining these laws over the past twenty-five years, a development of an entirely in the altogether set of problems arose problems that would fuel controversy over favorable action. A absolute majority of people are dissatisfied with current favourable action policies, besides are opposed to eliminating them completely Ameri hatfuls hold doggedly to notions of family and liberty, yet they as well believe in a sort of rough equality of opportunity that gives the underdog a real chance in life (Kahlenberg 209). at a time necessary, approving action programs have outlived their usefulness, and promote dis crimination by continuing to admit for un exclusively hiring practices. Affirmative action uses reverse discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination because it makes employers have to choose from the best available employee from the minorities, instead of having the possibility of simply choosing the best available employee. The primary goal of affirmative action programs was to increase the number of minorities, including women, in the workplace.The Ameri grass Association for Affirmative Action states that they are dedicated to the advancement of affirmative action, equal opportunity and the settlement of discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ethnic background or every other criterion that deprives people of opportunities to live and work, (AAAA Sept. 1998). Most people would check into that goal has been realized. There was a definite need for action to net individuals and corporations to the negative results of their prejudices. It is unlikely that corporati ons would have taken the initiative to hire from the minority groups had it not been for government intervention.Affirmative action has created numerous opportunities for women and minorities in this country. It would be difficult to argue that these programs were not absolutely essential in fashioning pass toward the semi-equality that we have today. However, affirmative action has evermore been a compromise, and with the progress made, a price has also been paid. Affirmative action must straight be rethought and restructured. Laws created preference programs that were ground in the conscience of the American people and in their commitment to equal treatment,(Roberts & Statton 67).The racial quotas that we experience today are blatant perversions that are il sub judice under the statutory language of the obliging Rights Act (Roberts & Stratton 67). If the goal is square equal opportunity employment, removal of all advantages and allowing people to be hired for their skills a nd abilities only should occur. Continuing to allow for unfair hiring practices, affirmative action programs promote discrimination. Using reverse discrimination, defined as the discerning treatment once morest white males instead of black males or women of any race, to solve the problem of discrimination will always receive chiding for its hypocrisy.For example, in 1965, the Newport News shipbuilding Co. buckled under the heavy hand of the EEOC, who had solicited complaints by knocking on the doors in black neighborhoods. The company reluctantly hold to promote 2,890 of its five potassium black thespians, designating 100 blacks as supervisors, and concord to a quota system. One shipyard worker stated that the EEOC had done its best to set black against white, labor against management, and abash everybody. (Roberts & Stratton 93).Another example of this reverse discrimination was in the education system the public case of Cheryl J. Hopwood, Douglas W. Carvell, Kenneth R. Ell iott, and David A. Rogers. They filed discrimination charges again the State of Texas stating they were discriminated against and denied introduction to the University of Texas School of Law. The college granted admission to less adapted African American and Mexican American applicants through the use of a quota system. This practice of preferential admissions for minorities furthers the practice of reverse discrimination, now not well(p) in the workplace, but also in the school systems. This creates animosities between workers that conduce to further segregation, defeating the intentions of the programs entirely.Through the demise of race-dividing policies, underrepresented individuals shielded by affirmative action would be forced to contend, on a level playing field, for jobs and admission to colleges and universities. Competition has nothing but positive effects and is crucial in accelerating capitalism. The debilitating effects of affirmative action and quotas hinder an in dividuals desire to compete in society. Destroying discrimination caused by past offenses whitethorn never have perfect solutions, therefore, creating valid arguments for maintaining the existence of equal opportunity programs.But, to continue to endure one group opportunity, due only to their minority status, at the outgo of another is wrong. Non-minorities continue to feel that their rights have been violated and that they are organism punished for crimes that they had no bump in committing. And when non-minorities are subject to the akin discrimination, they have little sanctuary Under the 1991 Civil Rights Act, white males can have no intellect for discrimination lawsuits until they are statistically underrepresented in management and line positions.The 1991 Act, in effect, repealed the 1964 act by legalizing racial preferences as the core of civil rights law (Roberts & Stratton). Regardless of good intentions, changing the past effects of discrimination is a goal that is far from reach, however, not unrealizable. Women and minorities should be entitled to enjoy the same successes as the rest of the country, without the fear of being seen as the beneficiary of entitlements. Business owners should be free to make tidy hiring decisions found on a persons skills and talents, without the fear of penalty from the government. As Marsha M. tates, Affirmative action is used not to level the playing field, but used to strong-arm employers into jobs, raises and promotions for Black Americans and women. The growing tensions that result from these programs continues to divide races, not fill them closer together. Ultimately, either quotas will go or democracy will, because legal privileges ground on status are incompatible with democracys requirement of equal stand up before the law (Roberts & Stratton 177). Allowing different sets of rules and lower standards to separate people based on race or sex, defeats any efforts made toward finally outcome discrim ination.Today every American has access to employment and educational opportunities. Americans live in a foundation of free green light where they can create their own successes. Americans have the means to achieve and succeed, they just have to have the drive and incentive to go out into the world and do it. As in every aspect of life most things may not come easily. Yet these experiences make one stronger and sometimes horizontal more determined to achieve their goals. Individuals of any race should not use or misuse the color of their skin or internal predilection for advancing themselves over others.These problems are what fuel the controversy over affirmative action. Most people are dissatisfied with current affirmative action policies, but are opposed to eliminating them completely Americans hold doggedly to notions of family and liberty, but they also believe in a sort of rough equality of opportunity that gives the underdog a real chance in life (Kahlenberg 209). Once a necessary evil, affirmative action programs have outlived their usefulness, and promote discrimination by continuing to allow for unfair hiring practices.The primary goal of affirmative action programs was to increase the number of minorities in the workplace. Most people would agree that that goal has been realized. There was a definite need for action to classify individuals and corporations to the negative results of their prejudices. It is unlikely that corporations would have taken the initiative to hire from the minority groups, had it not been for government intervention. Affirmative action has created numerous opportunities for women and minorities in this country.It would be difficult to argue that these programs were not absolutely essential in reservation progress toward equality that we have made today. The American Association for Affirmative Action states that they are dedicated to the advancement of affirmative action, equal opportunity and the elimination of discr imination on the basis of race, gender, ethnic background or any other criterion that deprives people of opportunities to live and work (AAAA Sept. 1998). However, affirmative action has always been a compromise, and with the progress made, a price has also been paid.Affirmative action must now be rethought and restructured. Laws created the preference programs were based in the conscience of the American people and in their commitment to equal treatment. The racial quotas that we experience today are blatant perversions that are sinful under the statutory language of the Civil Rights Act (Roberts & Stratton 67). If the goal is true equal opportunity employment, removal of all advantages and allowing people to be hired for their skills and abilities only should occur. By continuing to allow for unfair hiring practices, affirmative action programs promote discrimination.Using reverse discrimination to solve the problem of discrimination will always receive criticism for its hypocri sy. By requiring corporations to fulfill quotas, the affirmative action laws promote the hiring of less suffice workers. For example, in 1965, the Newport News Shipbuilding Co. buckled under the heavy hand of the EEOC, who had solicited complaints by knocking on the doors in black neighborhoods. The company reluctantly agreed to promote 2,890 of its five thousand black workers, designating 100 blacks as supervisors, and agreed to a quota system.One shipyard worker stated that the EEOC had done its best to set black against white, labor against management, and disconcert everybody. (Roberts & Stratton 93). This creates animosities between workers that lead to further segregation, defeating the intentions of the programs entirely. Another example of this reverse discrimination was in the education system the public case of Cheryl J. Hopwood, Douglas W. Carvell, Kenneth R. Elliott, and David A. Rogers. They filed discrimination charges again the State of Texas stating they were discr iminated against and denied admission to the University of Texas School of Law.The college granted admission to less qualified African American and Mexican American applicants through the use of a quota system. This practice of preferential admissions for minorities furthers the practice of reverse discrimination, now not just in the workplace, but also in the school systems. Affirmative action has never been a perfect solution and people will always have valid arguments for maintaining its existence. But, to continue to offer one group opportunity, due only to their minority status, at the expense of another is wrong.Non-minorities continue to feel that their rights have been violated and that they are being punished for crimes that they had no part in committing. And when non-minorities are subject to the same discrimination, they have little recourse Under the 1991 Civil Rights Act, white males can have no grounds for discrimination lawsuits until they are statistically underrepr esented in management and line positions. The 1991 Act, in effect, repealed the 1964 act by legalizing racial preferences as the core of civil rights law (Roberts & Stratton).Regardless of good intentions, changing the past effects of discrimination is an unattainable goal. Women and minorities should be entitled to enjoy the same successes as the rest of the country, without the fear of being seen as the beneficiary of entitlements. Business owners should be free to make intelligent hiring decisions based on a persons skills and talents, without the fear of penalty from the government. As Marsha M. states, Affirmative action is used not to level the playing field, but used to strong-arm employers into jobs, raises and promotions for Black Americans and women.The growing tensions that result from these programs continues to divide races, not bring them closer together. Allowing different sets of rules and lower Standards to separate people based on race or sex, defeats any efforts m ade toward finally ending discrimination. Ultimately, either quotas will go or democracy will, because legal privileges based on status are incompatible with democracys requirement of equal standing before the law (Roberts & Stratton 177). Today every American has access to employment and educational opportunities. Americans live in a world of free enterprise where they can create their own successes.Americans have the means to achieve and succeed, they just have to have the drive and incentive to go out into the world and do it. As in every aspect of life some things may not come easily. Yet these experiences make one stronger and sometimes even more determined to achieve their goals. Individuals of any race should not use or misuse the color of their skin or sexual orientation for advancing themselves over others. Instead by using their talents, knowledge and sense of fairness to achieve their goals, affirmative action will become outdated.