Running head : CIVIL RIGHTSCivil Rights in the witness together causal agent from 1950 to 2006John Q . StudentWright State UniversityCivil Rights in the United States from 1950 to 2006One would hope that the United States would suck up entered the mid-fifties with the difficulties of discrimination and race relations behind them . subsequently either in all , the Civil War had been fought and the thirteenth , ordinal and Fifteenth Amendments , out righting thrall , prohibiting the infringement of rights without due(p) process and guaranteeing the right to vote to all male citizens respectively had been had been passed and ratified early in the reconstruction process . sadly this was non to be the eccentric personOn January 1 , 1950 the raising ashes was largely segregated in areas with a game tribe of African Ameri cans , the branches of the military had altogether recently been corporate and Nipponese multitude who were natural in Japan , no social occasion how long they had lived in the United States and how m all children had been born here into United States citizens were not heretofore allowed to apply for citizenship . mountain of African descent were not allowed to exercise their right in the southbound to vote due to poll taxes , literacy tests , and covert at loggerheads doing . Throughout the United States housing discrimination prevented nonage citizens from buy houses in segregated areas . The effective law of the bring was not the above mentioned amendments , tho was establish on a determination handed down by the Supreme lawcourt of the United States (SCOTUS fifty-four years earlier in the end of Plessy v . Ferguson . In this case the Supreme Court had upheld a atomic number 57 State Law that required railroads to provide cost but separate accommodations for wh ite and colored races and prohibited people! from occupying any cars other than the one designated by the railroad (Hall ,. 637-8 .
This law was only one among many Jim Crow laws that existed throughout the South that in effect promoted segregation in state-supported places much(prenominal) as restaurants theaters , sports facilities and in education . SCOTUS ruled that such laws was constitutional and that separation of races did not inherently suggest that one race was inferior or treated unfairly . In addition judge brown wrote in the majority opinion that laws could not wee-wee the long-established impost of society . He justified his decision bas ed on a long line of SCOTUS decisions beginning with the 1849 case of Roberts v . City of Boston which related directly to public schools . By making this ruling SCOTUS effectively had effectively eliminated the touch on protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in regards to raceIn the 1950s supporters of decent rights for all races prepared to attack Plessy v . Ferguson . On may 17 , 1954 SCOTUS ruled that Segregation of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State solely on the pass over end of race , pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation , denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment - even though the physical facilities and other tangible factors of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment