Argumentative Essay

Student NameInstructor NameAssignmentDateThe Right to MonitorIn The Right to Be Let tod author Barry Glazer attempts to convince readers that the American giving medicine activity is all overstepping its boundaries and obstructive on the rights of citizens . His main personal conviction line is that government enforce[s] regulations that constrain our lives and crusade our freedoms Glazer considers such(prenominal) actions as sobriety checkpoints and building permits as nonhing further governmental red tape and inconveniences and invasion of rights for citizens much uniform , and including , himselfHowever , are the things that Glazer complaining about(predicate) re tout ensembley that plumping of deal in the larger dodge of things ? Are his points well-grounded ? Are civil rights , guaranteed rights under ou r makeup and vizor of Rights creation denied or abused by government officials and law officers ? I m sure that we could easily say yes in several instances that we personally know of , as Glazer has make , but in the larger scheme of things , if analyzed , are governmental regulations really that big of a deal or does their existence genuinely help to keep the freedoms that we are guaranteed in placeGlazer states , There is no reason for the government to interfere in our lives if our behavior does not adversely affect new(prenominal)s if on that point is no contiguous necessity for such interference First of all , the disapprobation does not even make much sense . secondly , there is a point here , I rely , and that is that Glazer believes that the government should not interfere in a private citizens brio if that person s behavior does not confirm it . Then he goes on to provide the illustration of a terminally ill person wanting to displume self-destruc tion . How does this action not affect any ! iodine ? How does culture one owns life not warrant action by soulfulness ?

If the government were NOT to act on something of this standard of measurement , it would be ridiculed , sued , and hung out to dry since one of the functions of the government is to treasure its hatful . Keeping them alive certainly seems to be critical in this process , so Glazer s principle that I should be allowed to kill myself certainly sets his argument up to be questionedThe close point that Glazer makes to support his overall argument is that the government should also stay out of an individual s life if there is no rea son to believe he is doing malign . The Bill of Rights protects us from unlawful searches and seizures Glazer then goes on to recollect an incident of sobriety check point procedures to natural covering up this point . The weakness in this ramifyicular part of the argument falls within the realm of common senseThe police do have the right to pull someone over if they believe that that particular individual poses a threat to other dealing or if there is probable cause . With inebriated operate being on the top of list of gratuitous deaths , to a greater extent people actually avail from this practice than are inconvenienced or bothered by the embarrassment of performing tricks...If you want to feature a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper