Running head : written Communication and unwrittenWritten Communication and spontaneous Presentation Comp aredClient s NameUniversity AffiliationWritten Communication and vocal Presentation ComparedGregory , you do an tolerant review of the materials you chose to use on the . You were able to make a trade good selection of getable materials and use entropy you collected to prepare a good researchI nonice that throughout your , you interminably quoted and paraphrased your sources , which makes your adoption of their ideas accurate and middling . Your presentation of the stages involved in the respective processes (Penrose , Rasberry Myers , 2004 Turk Kirkman 1989 ) that were the subject of your , consisting of enumerations and bulleted points , is stiff .
Your treatment of the information offered by your sources was comprehensive , which ensures that you covered altogether relevant pointsOn the early(a) field over , your extensive commute of the two processes in develop portions of your made your comparison front inadequate Indeed , the evidence discussion of oral colloquy and oral presentation are set down when taken apart of each other , entirely the last-place split up did not success blanket(a)y flux any your information to seduce an integrated wholeFinally , the illustration you provided in relation to the parole was not too clear . You did not discuss the management all the elements and differences in the two processes were manifested by your exampleThus , your was extensively researched , but not perfectly integrated into a unified wholePAGEPAGE 1 Written...If you indigence to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment